Advanced Search  |  Sitemap  |  Contact Us
  
 

FOLLOW US

Subscription required for full online access

Current subscribers to the Buffalo Law Journal, click here to create an account for full online access.

Not a subscriber? Click here to see subscription options. Questions about your online access? Call us at 716-541-1650.

Bizjournals Legal News

Attorney pleads guilty to three counts Thu, 24 May 2012 23:49:16 +0000
The Funded: Lex Machina, Lam Aviation Thu, 24 May 2012 21:22:58 +0000
Sorin Royer Cooper law firm splits up Thu, 24 May 2012 19:28:42 +0000

Google Legal News

Featured News - Current News - Archived News - News Categories

Fla. woman fights ruling that kept her in hospital

Thu, Jan 28th 2010 12:00 am
By BILL KACZOR
Associated Press

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. - Samantha Burton wanted to leave the hospital. Her doctor strongly disagreed, enough to go to court to keep her there.

She smoked cigarettes during the first six months of her pregnancy and was admitted on a false alarm of premature labor. Her doctor argued she was risking a miscarriage if she didn't quit smoking immediately and stay on bed rest in the hospital, and a judge agreed.

Three days after the judge ordered her not to leave the hospital, Burton delivered a stillborn fetus by cesarean section.

And six months after the pregnancy ended, the dispute over the legal move to keep her in the hospital continues, raising questions about where a mother's right to decide her own medical treatment ends and where the priority of protecting a fetus begins.

Burton, who declined to be interviewed, is appealing the judge's order. She isn't asking for money but hopes to keep her case from setting a precedent for legal control over women with problem pregnancies. She also worries that it could prevent women from seeking prenatal care.

Florida State Attorney Willie Meggs stands by his decision to seek the court order after being contacted by the hospital.

Burton is in her late 20s, has two young daughters and a common-law husband and holds down a job, said her lawyer, David Abrams. She didn't want an abortion, had obtained prenatal care and voluntarily went to the hospital after experiencing symptoms she'd been told to look out for, he said.

But she didn't like the care she received at Tallahassee Memorial Hospital. She said her doctor, Jana Bures-Foresthoefel, was brusk and overbearing. Abrams said smoking by itself doesn't cause miscarriages.

The mother said she wanted the option to seek care at another hospital or to go home so she could care for her two daughters.

"I was desperately hoping to receive the care I needed to save my baby," Burton wrote in her statement.

The doctor and hospital officials declined to comment, referring calls to the state prosecutor.

American Civil Liberties Union lawyer Diana Kasdan said the ruling "would be a horrible precedent."

Florida argues that Burton's case is rare - the only one out of 30,000 births in the Tallahassee area over the last 10 years.

There have been a few other cases in the U.S. that involve similar efforts by courts to intervene in pregnancies:

• In 1987, a Washington, D.C., judge ordered a woman who was dying of cancer to have a C-section, which she had refused, to save her fetus. The baby died within two hours of delivery and the mother died two days later. An appeals court later ruled that the judge should not have ordered the C-section.

• In 2003, prosecutors in Salt Lake City charged an acknowledged cocaine addict who had a history of mental-health problems with murder when she refused to have a C-section for two weeks. One of her twins died in the womb during the delay. The charge was reduced to child endangerment.

• In 2004, a hospital in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, obtained a court order to force a woman to have a C-section because her seventh baby was oversized, but the order was too late. The mother, whose first six children each weighed nearly 12 pounds at birth, went to another hospital and delivered a nearly-12-pound girl naturally.

• Also in 2004, a judge in Rochester ordered a homeless woman not to get pregnant again without court approval after she lost custody of several neglected children.

Abrams said Burton's condition didn't merit such extreme action as ordering her to stay at the hospital.

The judge ruled that the best interests of the fetus overrode Burton's privacy rights, but Abrams disputes that. He notes that the Florida Constitution has an explicit privacy right, which the state Supreme Court has said guarantees a competent person the right to "choose or refuse medical treatment."

Circuit Judge Hon. John Cooper held an emergency hearing by telephone and ruled after taking testimony from Burton and Bures-Foresthoefel, but without obtaining a second medical opinion.

Meggs, the prosecutor, said there was no time to get a second opinion because the situation was so dire: Burton was threatening to leave the hospital and her doctor believed that would have endangered the fetus.

"Sometimes there is not time for two doctors," Meggs said. "It's not time for a committee."

A three-judge panel of Florida's 1st District Court of Appeal heard oral argument earlier this month but has not indicated when it will rule.