Advanced Search  |  Sitemap  |  Contact Us
  
 

FOLLOW US

Subscription required for full online access

Current subscribers to the Buffalo Law Journal, click here to create an account for full online access.

Not a subscriber? Click here to see subscription options. Questions about your online access? Call us at 716-541-1650.

Bizjournals Legal News

Sorin Royer Cooper law firm splits up Thu, 24 May 2012 19:28:42 +0000
Juniper Village license restored Thu, 24 May 2012 18:56:18 +0000
UPMC fires back in antitrust lawsuit Thu, 24 May 2012 18:54:26 +0000
Guess how much your lawyer makes Thu, 24 May 2012 18:45:43 +0000

Google Legal News

Featured News - Current News - Archived News - News Categories

NYC fan distributor agrees to pay $587,500 settlement

Thu, Jul 23rd 2009 12:00 am
WASHINGTON (AP) - A New York City distributor has agreed to pay more than $500,000 to settle a complaint that it was slow in reporting a defect and fire hazard linked to oscillating fans.

The $587,500 penalty is part of a settlement Haier America Trading LLC reached with the Consumer Product Safety Commission. The agency announced Friday that the settlement resolves CPSC staff allegations that the company knowingly failed to immediately report to the agency that the fan posed a risk of fire.

Manufacturers, distributors and retailers are required by law to immediately report defects that could create safety hazards.

The Oscillating Tower Fan, model FTM140GG, poses a fire hazard because repeated bending of the fan's wires during oscillation causes the wires to break, the CPSC said.

The agency said Haier America, which distributed the product, received from May to October 2004 about 14 reports of incidents involving the fans, including reports of fires and one report of injuries. The company finally reported the problem in December 2004, after the agency asked the company to do so, said the CPSC.

Friday's announcement comes nearly four years after the products, made in China, were recalled in November 2005.

CPSC spokesman Scott Wolfson wouldn't comment on exactly why the announcement of a settlement came years later. But he said it's a situation where the agency put all of its resources into first recalling the product.

"In aftermath (of a recall), we begin to work up our legal case," he said. "It can take time to negotiate a settlement."

The CPSC said that, in agreeing to the settlement, the company denies the agency's allegations.